The forensic scientist who conducts the interview must strictly follow the exact methods and techniques of interviewing so that the interview is of high quality and the information leads to the goal for which the interview is being conducted, in this case elucidating the crime and bringing its perpetrator to justice. A step ahead of the experts is when the subjects of their interviews are children, especially children who are victims of a criminal act. This is a particularly sensitive category that has already been exposed to a traumatic experience, so the interview itself must be particularly sensitive. The expert who leads it must also know the child's developmental characteristics, i.e. understand the age of the child being interviewed, assess the child's ability to discern morality, approach the child gently, be careful not to expose himself to additional stress, and get a good and quality interview from all of this. In addition, the room in which the interview is conducted must satisfy so many details that the child would feel relaxed and comfortable, and on the other hand, so few details that the interview would not turn into a game. Interviewing a child criminal must be divided into strictly defined phases such as: introduction, establishing rapport, examining episodic memory, moving on to questions relevant to the case, investigating the case, pauses, obtaining unmentioned information, disclosure information, closing and neutral thematizing. In the end, as with every forensic interview, it is necessary to carry out an evaluation that will look at the conducted forensic interview in order to see what were the advantages and disadvantages of forensic interviewing and to determine a good and educated expert who can continue to perform such tasks, because forensic interviewing in general, and especially forensic interviewing of a child, a victim of a criminal act, is not a job that every forensic scientist can perform.